- Celebrating the Word of God
- Hits: 56
THE HOLY BODY AND BLOOD OF JESUS
INVITED TO THE BANQUET OF WORD AND BREAD
Jesus did not leave us a statue, a photograph, or a relic of himself. He wanted to continue to be present among his disciples as food. Food is not placed on the table to be contemplated but to be consumed. Christians who attend Mass but do not receive communion must be aware that they are not participating fully in the Eucharistic celebration.
Food becomes part of who we are. By eating the body and drinking the blood of Christ,we accept his invitation to identify with him. We express to God and the community ourintention to form a single body with Christ; we wish to assimilate his gesture of love and desire to give our lives to our brothers and sisters as he did. This demanding choice is notmade alone but with the entire community. The Eucharist is not a meal to be consumed in isolation: it is bread broken and shared among brothers and sisters.
On the one hand, it is inconceivable that a gesture indicating unity, sharing, equality, and reciprocal giving should be made. Conversely, the perpetuation of conflicts, hatred, jealousy, hoarding of goods, and oppression should be tolerated. As Paul recalls, a community that celebrates the rite of ‘breaking of bread’ in these unworthy conditions eats and drinks its condemnation (1 Cor 11:28-29). It is a community that transforms the sacrament into a lie. It is like a girl who, smiling, accepts a ring from her fiancé, the symbol of an indissoluble bond of love, and at the same time, betrays him with other lovers.
"The Eucharist makes me attentive to all forms of hunger of my brothers and sisters: hunger for bread, hunger for love, hunger for understanding, hunger for forgiveness,and above all hunger for God."
First Reading: Genesis 14:18-20
The fourteenth chapter of the book of Genesis from which our reading is taken is unique: it presents Abraham in the unusual role of a brave warrior. The patriarch is at the Oaks of Mamre, near Hebron, and learns that some kings from the East have captured his nephew Lot. He immediately organizes his armed men, chases the kidnappers to Dan in the extreme north of Palestine, swoops down on them, defeats them, recovers all the booty, andLot, his goods, his women, and his people.
On his way back, he passes near Salem (Jerusalem), where Melchizedek reigns. Melchizedek—king and priest of the Most High God—when he learns that Abraham is approaching, goes out of the city and offers him bread and wine, then blesses him, invoking the name of his God. To understand the message of the passage, it must be kept in mind that, at the time of Abraham, Jerusalem was a city inhabited by a pagan people and remained so for many hundreds of years until, around the year 1000 B.C., David conquered it and made it the capital of his kingdom.
In the account of the heroic feat accomplished by Abraham, the scene of the meeting with Melchizedek, king of Salem, is included for various reasons. When this account was written (more than a thousand years after the events), the Israelites looked upon neither Jerusalem, its king, nor its court with sympathy, and they grudgingly paid taxes. With skill (and flattery), the author of the passage then tries, citing the example of Abraham (v. 20), to persuade them to submit to the king of Jerusalem and pay him their tithes (without too much muttering!). I have pointed out this ingenious stratagem of the scribe to show how, sometimes, God uses even the less noble motivations of people to introduce into the Bible a story that is precious because it is full of religious symbolism.
It was not only to convince the Israelites to pay their taxes that the sacred author recalled Abraham's humble and devout behavior towards the king of Salem. Above all, he wanted to teach that foreigners should no longer be viewed negatively. God showed that he did not reveal himself only to the Israelites but also to other people. Melchizedek was a Canaanite, a pagan, yet he already worshipped the Most High God, creator of heaven and earth. Before him, the patriarch Abraham made a surprising gesture: he bowed and received his blessing. On no other page of the Old Testament is a pagan minister of worship looked upon with such respect and sympathy.
This passage from the book of Genesis was chosen as the first reading because it references today's feast. First, Christians have always considered Melchizedek to be a figure of Christ and of the priests of the New Covenant who offer bread and wine on the altar. Other elements relate the gesture made by this priest-king to the Eucharist. He shared his bread and wine with those who were hungry, and his generous behavior was a call to share goods with his brothers and sisters.
Finally, it is significant that the bread and wine of Melchizedek are consumed together by two people: the pagan people of Salem and the chosen people of the children of Abraham, the Jews. It is as if these two peoples—though so distant from a political, cultural,and religious point of view—had gathered around a single table. It is the image of what happens in the Christian community that gathers to break the Eucharistic bread: we have the meeting, the welcoming, the sharing, and the mutual exchange of blessings.
Second Reading: 1 Cor 11:23-26
To understand this critical passage, it is necessary to clarify why Paul introduces the theme of the institution of the Eucharist in his letter. Then, we will try to interpret the meaning of Jesus' gesture. In Corinth, there are severe problems: sexual debauchery, unrest, envy, drunkenness, and—what is worse—discord among the brothers and sisters. Parties arose, people disagreed on moral choices, and the division into classes was accepted as expected: that of the rich and that of the poor, that of the nobles and the simple people.
Divisions are always harmful, but when they manifest themselves during the celebration of the Eucharist, they become scandalous. At Corinth, Christians were accustomed to having a typical meal before Holy Communion, like true brothers and sisters. They knew well that it was necessary to share the material bread to break the Eucharistic bread worthily. Holy Communion was celebrated not in churches, as with us, but in private homes made available by wealthy community members.
Now, the group of rich people, masters, and nobles—who do not work but make their servants work—meet early in the afternoon. They meet in the villa of one of them, stroll in the garden, talk happily, lie down on sofas, and begin to gorge themselves. Then, in the evening, when their brothers and sisters arrive, exhausted by fatigue—they belong to the humblest classes (peasants, laborers, dockers)—the rich welcome them with jeers and rudejokes. Then, without realizing the painful situation created, they begin to celebrate the Eucharist.
To show the absurdity of such behavior, Paul reminds the Corinthians how Jesus instituted the Eucharist. The most profound experiences and significant messages are difficult to put into words. To communicate with them, we resort to gestures: with a sweet look, we express tenderness; with a prolonged handshake, we emphasize our entireagreement with a friend; with an embrace, we reconcile with our brother or sister; with an ugly gesture, we vent our irrepressible anger.
Is it possible to summarize the entire life, the whole work, the entire person of Jesus in a single gesture? Yes, it is possible, and he chose and made the gesture on the eve of his passion. During the Last Supper, he took the bread, broke it, and said: ‘This is my broken body’; then he took the wine and said: ‘This is my shed blood.’ To his disciples, Jesus wanted to say: ‘My whole life has been a gift to people; for me, I have not held back an instant of my life, nor a cell of my body, nor a drop of my blood. I have offered myself completely; I have given myself completely.’
Every time the Christian community breaks the Eucharistic bread at the Lord's invitation, Jesus, who gives his life out of love, is represented. How can the Corinthians—Paul asks—repeat this gesture that indicates sacrifice and the gift of life, union with Christ and their brothers and sisters, and then, in reality, foment divisions, cultivate discord, and perpetuate inequality?
Considering the not-always-consistent life of our Christian communities, we may have wondered how we can continue to celebrate the Eucharist in certain situations. This is a legitimate doubt. However, it should not be forgotten that the Eucharistic bread is a gift, not a deserved prize reserved for the good. It is food offered to sinners, not the righteous (because no one is righteous). Even if we realize we are unworthy, we continue approachingthe Eucharistic banquet. It reminds us of our condition of sinners and encourages us to become what we are not yet: bread broken and wine poured out for the brothers and sisters.
Gospel: Luke 9:11b-17
There are many ways to explain the Eucharist. Paul chooses one: he recounts—as we have seen—its institution during the Last Supper. Luke chooses another: he takes an episode from Jesus' life—the sharing of the loaves—and rereads it from a Eucharistic perspective. He uses it, that is, to make the Christians of his communities understand what is meant by the act of breaking bread that they repeat regularly, every week, on the Lord's Day.
Suppose today's Gospel passage is read as a faithful chronicle of an event. In that case,one encounters a series of difficulties: one does not understand what five thousand men went to do in a deserted place (v. 12), and one does not even know where so many people could have come from (v. 14). strangely, even the fish are broken (v. 16), and it would be difficult to explain where the twelve baskets for the remains came from (v. 17); had the people brought them with them empty? Then it is late in the evening (v. 12) when the meal begins; how did the twelve, in the dark, manage to put so many people in order and to distribute the loaves and fish? We are not in front of a chronicle, and it makes no sense to ask how exactly the events took place because it is difficult to determine. The evangelist has built a theological reflection on an event in the life of Jesus, and we are interested in understanding the message he wants to convey rather than in reconstructing what happened.
The first reading key that we use is the one of the Old Testament. Luke's Christian communities were accustomed to the language of the Bible and immediately grasped the allusions to facts, texts, expressions, and characters of the Old Testament, which we may overlook. The account of the distribution of the loaves reminded them:
These references to the Old Testament should be remembered because Luke intends to allude to them. Still, he also refers to the celebration of the Eucharist as it takes place in his communities.
Let us begin with the first verse (v. 11), which, unfortunately, is not entirely quoted in our lectionary. Let us also take up the missing part: "Jesus welcomed the crowds and began to speak to them…." Only Luke says that when the crowds arrived at Bethsaida, Jesus welcomed them and spoke about the kingdom of God. He had withdrawn into the background with the disciples, perhaps seeking a moment of quiet, but the people, in need of his word and his help, reached him, and he welcomed them, announced the good news of the kingdom of God, and healed the sick. To welcome means to pay attention, allow oneself to be involved in the needs of others, and show interest in their spiritual and material needs.
In this first verse, the reference to the celebration of the Eucharist is evident: the liturgy of the Lord's Day always begins with the gesture of the celebrant welcoming the community, wishing peace, and announcing the kingdom of God. Like Jesus, he welcomes everyone. Welcome are the good, and welcome are the sinners. Welcome are the poor, the sick, the weak, the excluded, and those who seek a word of hope and forgiveness; no one is turned away.
Paul, too, concluding the chapter on the Eucharist from which today's passage from the second reading is taken, recommends this welcome to the Christians of Corinth: "My brothers, when you gather for supper, welcome one another" (1 Cor 11:33).
In verse 12, the time Jesus distributes his bread is emphasized: "The day was beginning to decline." I noted above the difficulty of understanding this as information (completely redundant, by the way). ‘The day began to decline’ is instead a precious and even moving indication. We also find it in the account of the disciples of Emmaus. "Stay with us," the two say to their companion on the journey, "for the evening is coming and the day is waning" (Lk 24:29). This detail informs us about the time when, on Saturday evening, Holy Communion was celebrated in Luke's communities.
The desert place (v. 12) also has a theological significance: it recalls the journey of the people of Israel who, having left the land of slavery, set out on their way to freedom and were fed with manna. The community that celebrates the Eucharist comprises wandererswho are making an exodus. They dared to leave their homes, villages, friends, and the kind of life they led, and they set out to listen to the Master and be cared for by him. Like Israel, they entered the desert and set out for freedom. Others—who also heard the voice of the Lord—preferred to remain where they were, not wanting to take risks. Unfortunately for them, by doing so, they deprived themselves of the nourishment that Jesus gives those who follow him.
Jesus orders the twelve to feed the crowds (vv. 12-14). The first reaction of the twelve is astonishment and surprise, the feeling of being called to a vast, absurd, impossible task. They make a proposal that contradicts the welcome given by the Master: they suggest sending the people back home, sending them away, and dispersing them. Everyone should think about solving his problems as best he can.
The disciples do not realize the gift that Jesus will deliver into their hands: the bread of the Word and the Eucharistic bread. They do not understand that his blessing will endlessly multiply this food that satisfies every hunger: the hunger for happiness, love, justice, peace, the need to give meaning to life, and the longing for a new world. These needs are so pressing and unstoppable that they sometimes push us to eat what we do not satisfy, whichcan exacerbate hunger or cause nausea. Therefore, the Master insists: it is from you that the world expects food; give yourselves food.
His Word is a bread that multiplies miraculously: those who accept the Gospel and feed their lives with it, those who assimilate the person of Christ by eating the Eucharistic bread, in turn, feel the need to share their discovery and their joy with others and begin to distribute to them to the bread that has satisfied their hunger. This triggers an unstoppable process of sharing, and the twelve baskets of remains are always packed and ready to begin the distribution again. The more those who eat the bread of the Word of Christ and the Eucharist increase, the more the bread distributed to the hungry multiplies.
Verse 14 points out a curious detail: Jesus does not want his food to be consumed in solitude, each on his own, as one does at self-service. However, not even large groups are good because they do not know each other, do not want dialogue, and cannot establish friendship, mutual help, and brotherhood relationships. At the time of Luke, fifty was the ideal number of community members. Remember that, in the early centuries, the Eucharist was not celebrated in churches but in large halls (Acts 2:46), so the number of participants was necessarily limited. One of the reasons for the laziness, coldness, and lack of initiative of some of today's communities depends precisely on a large number of participants.
In the New Testament, Luke only uses the Greek verb ‘kataklinein' five times, which means "to lay at the table" (v. 15). This indicates the position that free people assume when attending a solemn banquet. The Israelites thus reclined during the Passover supper. It is improper to employ this verb in a situation like the one described in today's Gospel passage, to refer it to people in the desert, in the open air, and in the habit of sitting on the ground with their legs crossed.
If Luke uses this expression, he does so for a theological reason: to allude to another meal, that of the Christian community seated around the Eucharistic table, the supper of the new Easter, consumed by free people.
The formula used to describe the multiplication of the loaves is well known to us: "He took the loaves (and the fish) and, raising his eyes to heaven, he blessed them, broke them and gave them..." (v. 16). These are the celebrant's gestures in the Eucharist celebration (cf. Lk 22:19). It almost seems that Luke is somewhat profaning the words of the sacramental act, confusing the things of earth with those of heaven, material needs with those of the spirit.
This ‘commingling’ of matter and spirit is not dangerous for the faith. The opposite is dangerous: to untie the Eucharist from people’s lives, to take it into the clouds; Eucharists that do not also celebrate the concrete commitment of the whole community to multiply the material bread so that there may be bread for everyone and more. The communion of goods is represented in the Eucharistic celebration by the offertory. This is when each community member presents their generous gift to distribute to those in need.
We often wonder what happened to the fish; all attention seems focused on the loaves. Even the fish are, strangely enough, ‘broken’ and distributed along with the bread (v. 16). In the communities of Luke's time, the fish had become the symbol of Christ. The letters that make up the Greek word ‘ichthys’ (fish) had already become the acrostic for Jesus, Christ, Son, of God, Savior. The fish is, therefore, Jesus himself, who became food in the Eucharist.